Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Thomas v State of Queensland

Thomas v State of Queensland

[2025] QSC 242 · Freeburn J

In plain language

Tinu Thomas, a theatre nurse at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, brought a workplace injury claim against the State of Queensland. She said that in June 2020 she hurt her left hand, wrist, elbow and shoulder while using force to loosen the adjustment knob on a surgical equipment stand. More than five years later, neither she nor her lawyers had identified the particular stand involved. She applied to inspect a whole floor of the operating hospital so she and an expert could find a similar stand and examine it. The court refused this, finding the request was too broad and amounted to a fishing expedition rather than investigating a specific, properly pleaded claim. There are dozens of stands of different models on that floor, and inspecting an unidentified one years later would not help decide any issue. The court also allowed the State's separate request to set the matter down for trial without the plaintiff's signature. No damages were decided in this procedural ruling.

Incident & injury

Plaintiff sustained injury while attempting to loosen the adjustment knob on a Mayo Surgical Stand using greater force on her second attempt, causing sharp pain in her left hand, wrist, elbow and shoulder.

Body regions
Hand / wrist, Left hand, Left wrist, Left elbow, Left shoulder (Left)
Incident date
26 June 2020
Location
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane

Quick facts

Date of judgment
23 September 2025
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Registered nurse (theatre nurse) Professional

Outcome

Plaintiff's application under UCPR r 250 to inspect level four of the RBWH for the purposes of inspecting a Mayo stand was dismissed. The defendant's application under UCPR r 469 to dispense with the plaintiff's signature on the request for trial date was granted. The court found the proposed inspection lacked focus and amounted to a fishing expedition.

Key issues

  • UCPR r 250 inspection of property
  • Request for trial date - UCPR r 469
  • Fishing expedition
  • Vague pleadings
  • Identification of plant/equipment
📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Thomas v State of Queensland [2025] QSC 242

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about WorkCover common law claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive