Sutton v Hunter & Anor

[2022] QCA 208 · Bond JA, Crow J, Mellifont J

In plain language

Kate Sutton was injured in a car accident in February 2015 and developed post-traumatic stress disorder, her most serious injury. She had been out of the workforce for almost a decade raising her children but intended to return to work shortly before the accident. Liability for the accident was admitted, so the only dispute was how much she should receive. At trial a Supreme Court judge awarded her damages, including amounts for past and future loss of earning capacity, totalling about $314,000. She appealed, arguing the awards were too low. The Court of Appeal agreed that the trial judge wrongly assumed she would fully recover her earning capacity by 2025, when the medical evidence showed her condition was chronic and permanent. The Court found she had suffered a 50% loss of earning capacity and increased her future loss award to $307,000, lifting her total recovery to about $544,000. Because this exceeded an earlier settlement offer she had made, she was also awarded her trial costs on the indemnity basis.

Incident & injury

Car accident on 10 February 2015 caused by the negligence of the first respondent

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
Post-traumatic stress disorder
Incident date
10 February 2015

Quick facts

Date of judgment
25 October 2022
Claim type
MAIA
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
43
Occupation
Out of the workforce; intended to return to work (possible managerial position in small business) Homemaker
Liability
Admitted
ISV assessed
10 · Item 12, Schedule 4 (moderate mental disorder)
Total damages
$543,988

Outcome

The Court of Appeal allowed the plaintiff's appeal, finding the primary judge erred in concluding she would suffer no diminution in earning capacity after 2025. It substituted an award of $307,000 for future economic loss (a 50% loss over 17 years), increasing the total damages from $314,345 to $543,988, and awarded the plaintiff her trial costs on the indemnity basis.

Defendant

1 Allianz Australia Insurance Limited

CTP Insurer

Judgment against this defendant
$543,988
Heads of damage
Past economic loss $180,336
Future loss of economic capacity $307,000

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Sutton v Hunter & Anor [2022] QCA 208

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive