Star Aged Living Limited v Lee

[2024] QCA 1 · Bowskill CJ, Bond JA, Flanagan JA

In plain language

The plaintiff worked as an assistant in nursing at an aged care home and said she hurt her back on 19 December 2015 while moving residents without a slide sheet. Her injury was serious — she developed cauda equina syndrome, needed major spinal surgery, and never returned to work. She did not see a lawyer until late 2019, a year after the three-year time limit to sue had run out. She asked the court to extend the time limit, arguing she only later learned key facts about her inability to work and the strength of her claim. The trial judge granted the extension. On appeal, the Court of Appeal found there was no proper basis for that decision: the plaintiff already knew enough before the deadline to bring a worthwhile claim, and the supposedly new facts were either unsupported by evidence or did not change the picture. The appeal was allowed and her application to extend time was dismissed, so her claim cannot now go ahead.

Incident & injury

Back injury sustained while moving residents without a slide sheet during a nursing shift

Diagnoses
Discal protrusion at L4/5 causing cauda equina syndrome, Incisional hernia following corrective surgery, Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression
Incident date
19 December 2015
Location
Star Gardens Nursing Home (aged care facility)

Quick facts

Date of judgment
25 January 2024
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
30
Occupation
Assistant in Nursing at an aged care facility Community & Personal Service Worker

Outcome

The Court of Appeal allowed the employer's appeal, holding that the primary judge erred in finding the plaintiff had established a material fact of a decisive character under s 31(2)(a) of the Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld). The plaintiff's application to extend the limitation period was dismissed, meaning her underlying workplace injury claim cannot proceed.

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Star Aged Living Limited v Lee [2024] QCA 1

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive