Slaughter v Harvey

[2021] QDC 156 ยท Barlow QC DCJ

Incident & injury

Alleged negligent psychiatric treatment, including misdiagnosis of depressive illness and prescription of psychiatric medications causing side effects, over the period 1984 to 2016.

Body regions
Psychiatric, Neurological
Diagnoses
Alleged medication side effects, Alleged misdiagnosis of depressive illness

Quick facts

Date of judgment
29 July 2021
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
N/A
Occupation
Not stated

Outcome

Defendant's application under s 35 of PIPA to compel the plaintiff to attend a psychiatric medical examination was adjourned. The court found that two requirements (taking a photograph; sessions exceeding two hours without consent) would be unreasonable, but that refusal of a support person and refusal to permit recording did not make the examination unreasonable. Adjourned to allow the defendant to ascertain whether nominated psychiatrists would agree to revised conditions. Costs reserved.

Key issues

๐Ÿ“‘ Cite this case (AGLC4)

Slaughter v Harvey [2021] QDC 156

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

โ† Back to the case archive