Schokman v CCIG Investments Pty Ltd

[2021] QSC 120 · Crow J

Incident & injury

Plaintiff was urinated on by intoxicated co-worker/roommate while sleeping in shared employee accommodation, triggering cataplectic attack and aggravating pre-existing narcolepsy and cataplexy

Diagnoses
Aggravation of pre-existing narcolepsy and cataplexy, Post-traumatic stress disorder (in remission), Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood
Incident date
7 November 2016
Location
Daydream Island Resort, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
27 May 2021
Proceeding
Trial
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
25
Occupation
Food and beverage supervisor Manager
Liability
Disputed
ISV assessed
17 uplift applied · Item 8 (minor brain injury analog) / Sch 9 WCRR
Total damages
$0

Outcome

Judgment for the defendant. Crow J found that although the employer owed a duty of care extending to accommodation provided as a condition of employment, the plaintiff failed to establish breach or causation under ss 305B and 305D WCRA, and the employer was not vicariously liable for the co-worker's act of urinating on the plaintiff. Quantum was assessed contingently at $431,738.88 had liability been established.

Defendant

1 CCIG Investments Pty Ltd

Employer

Judgment against this defendant
$0
WorkCover refund
$215,521
Medicare refund
$3,155
Heads of damage
General damages $29,590
Past economic loss $104,438
Past superannuation $9,922
Future loss of economic capacity $400,000
Future superannuation $45,200
Past special damages (plaintiff) $2,412
Past special damages (WorkCover) $26,079
Future special damages $7,500
Fox v Wood $18,965
Subtotal before refunds $647,260

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Schokman v CCIG Investments Pty Ltd [2021] QSC 120

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive