Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Ryan v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service

Ryan v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service

[2025] QSC 181 · Smith J

In plain language

Trent Ryan, a man who underwent bowel surgery at a Gold Coast hospital in February 2014, was left with chronic abdominal pain that prevented him from returning to work. He later obtained an expert surgeon's report saying he had not been properly warned of the risks of the operation. Because he learned of this potential negligence after the normal three-year time limit had passed, he asked the court for an extension of time so his medical negligence claim could proceed, and for permission to add claims under consumer law. The court found the expert report was a crucial new fact that he could not reasonably have known earlier, extended the time limit, confirmed his court proceedings were validly started, and allowed the extra consumer-law claims. The hospital's application to have the claim dismissed was refused. This ruling lets the underlying claim go ahead but does not decide whether the hospital was negligent or what damages, if any, the plaintiff will receive.

Incident & injury

Laparoscopic anterior resection of the colon for diverticular disease, allegedly performed without adequate warning of risks, resulting in chronic neuropathic pain in left iliac fossa

Body regions
Abdomen / pelvis, Abdomen, Peripheral nerve
Diagnoses
Chronic neuropathic pain, Possible neuroma/peripheral nerve injury
Incident date
11 February 2014
Location
Gold Coast Hospital

Quick facts

Date of judgment
7 August 2025
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
~34 (inferred)
Occupation
Not stated

Outcome

The court extended the limitation period under s 31(1) of the Limitation of Actions Act, ordered under s 59(2)(b) PIPA that the plaintiff had until 5 March 2018 to file, declared the proceedings validly instituted, granted leave to add Australian Consumer Law causes of action, and dismissed the defendant's strike-out application. Costs ordered to be costs in the cause.

Defendant

1 Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service

Hospital/Healthcare provider

Judgment against this defendant
$0

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Ryan v Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service [2025] QSC 181

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about medical negligence claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive