Reddock v ST&T Pty Ltd & Anor

[2022] QSC 293 · Jackson J

In plain language

Karen Reddock was a 41-year-old concrete delivery truck driver. On her birthday in July 2018 she hurt her left hand and wrist while struggling to move a stiff, jammed swivel chute on her truck. The chute had jammed because a worn brake lining had failed, and a batching manager (employed by the company she delivered for) had unsuccessfully tried to fix it with grease before sending her out on another job. She developed an ongoing wrist condition and a significant psychiatric illness, and could no longer work as a truck driver. The court found both her labour-hire employer and the host company negligent — the employer for not giving her clear instructions to stop and report problems, and the host company because its manager pressed her to keep working with a faulty chute. The judge split the blame equally between them. Her damages were reduced by 30–40% because she had a pre-existing tendency to develop her wrist condition anyway. She effectively recovered about $727,000.

Incident & injury

Plaintiff injured her left hand/wrist trying to rotate a stiff and jammed swivel chute on a concrete delivery truck after a defective brake lining caused the chute to stick.

Diagnoses
Left de Quervain's tenosynovitis, Left thumb CMC strain, Partial injury to superficial radial nerve, Major depressive disorder, Adjustment disorder with anxious mood
Incident date
26 July 2018
Location
Coopers Plains / Browns Plains batching plant; injury sustained at Juliette Street, Annerley, Brisbane

Quick facts

Date of judgment
13 January 2023
Proceeding
Trial
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
41
Occupation
Concrete delivery truck driver Machinery Operator / Driver
Liability
Disputed
ISV assessed
22 uplift applied · Item 11 (Serious Mental Disorder) - WCRR Schedule 9
Whole Person Impairment
4%
Total damages
$727,134

Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant (employer) for $633,253.53 (clear of WorkCover refund) and against the second defendant (host/principal) for $727,133.81 at common law, with liability apportioned 50/50 and reciprocal contribution orders made. The plaintiff can recover only once, with the larger common-law judgment of $727,133.81 being her actual recovery.

Defendants (2)

1 ST&T Pty Ltd

Employer (labour-hire)

Apportionment
50%
Judgment against this defendant
$633,254
WorkCover refund
$30,699
Medicare refund
$672
Heads of damage
General damages $43,230
Past economic loss $140,072
Interest on past EL $10,705
Past superannuation $13,616
Future loss of economic capacity $376,920
Future superannuation $44,552
Past special damages (plaintiff) $1,529
Past special damages (WorkCover) $11,366
Interest on past special damages $397
Future special damages $17,500
Fox v Wood $3,394
Subtotal before refunds $663,953

2 Boral Resources (Qld) Pty Limited

Host/principal (occupier of batching plant)

Apportionment
50%
Judgment against this defendant
$727,134
Medicare refund
$672
Heads of damage
General damages $45,500
Interest on general damages $4,004
Past economic loss $140,072
Interest on past EL $10,924
Past superannuation $13,616
Future loss of economic capacity $376,920
Future superannuation $44,552
Past care (Griffiths v Kerkemeyer) $9,618
Interest on past care $846
Future care $46,224
Past special damages (plaintiff) $1,529
Past special damages (WorkCover) $11,366
Interest on past special damages $397
Future special damages $17,500
Fox v Wood $3,394
Subtotal before refunds $727,134

Contribution orders

  • Boral Resources (Qld) Pty Limited ordered to contribute $363,567 to ST&T Pty Ltd (Law Reform Act 1995 (Qld) s 6(c) - 50/50 apportionment)
  • ST&T Pty Ltd ordered to contribute $331,976 to Boral Resources (Qld) Pty Limited (Law Reform Act 1995 (Qld) s 6(c) - 50/50 apportionment)

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Reddock v ST&T Pty Ltd & Anor [2022] QSC 293

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive