Purcell v Indigenous Land and Sea Corporation & Anor

[2024] QSC 58 · Crow J

In plain language

Nathan Purcell injured his right knee in March 2013 when he slipped on wet, worn timber steps at a cattle station near Gayndah where he worked as a senior station hand. He had a workers' compensation claim and several surgeries over the following years, and was able to keep working as a butcher. He did not start a common-law damages claim until about a decade later, well outside the normal time limit. The court had to decide whether the limit should be extended. The judge found that Mr Purcell did not have enough information to know he had a worthwhile claim until June 2022, when a specialist gave a new opinion that his knee would stop him doing heavy work within seven to ten years. Because that crucial fact only became known then, and because he had reasonably relied on an experienced solicitor, the judge extended the time limit so the claim could proceed. The respondents were ordered to pay his costs.

Incident & injury

Slipped on wet wooden cottage steps without handrail or non-slip treatment while descending; landed awkwardly injuring right knee

Body regions
Knee / lower leg, Right knee (Right)
Diagnoses
Right knee ACL rupture (revision), Medial meniscal tear/failed repair, Degenerative/arthritic change in right knee
Incident date
7 March 2013
Location
Mimosa Station, near Gayndah, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
12 April 2024
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
~32 (inferred)
Occupation
Senior station hand / butcher Technician / Trade Worker

Outcome

Court granted extension of the limitation period under s 31(2) Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld), finding that the material fact of a decisive nature (Dr Winstanley's supplementary report of 27 June 2022 about occupational prognosis) was not within Mr Purcell's means of knowledge until that date. Costs awarded to the applicant on the standard basis.

Defendants (2)

Joint and several liability. The plaintiff received a single recovery of $0 — not the sum of the amounts shown below. The figures listed against each defendant are the judgment amounts recorded in the order; the defendants are jointly and severally liable, so the plaintiff is paid once.

1 Indigenous Land and Sea Corporation

Occupier (landowner)

Judgment against this defendant
$0

2 Primary Partners Pty Ltd

Employer

Judgment against this defendant
$0

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Purcell v Indigenous Land and Sea Corporation & Anor [2024] QSC 58

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive