Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Potter v Gympie Regional Council

Potter v Gympie Regional Council

[2022] QCA 255 · Flanagan JA (Mullins P and Williams J agreeing)

In plain language

Mr Potter was a manager in the Local Laws Branch of the Gympie Regional Council. In July 2014 he was suspended on full pay while the Council investigated misconduct allegations made against him by another staff member. He later developed a psychiatric condition (an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood) and never returned to work. He sued the Council, arguing that the way it suspended him caused his psychiatric injury. The trial judge dismissed his claim, finding the Council did not owe a duty of care when suspending him, that the risk of psychiatric injury was not reasonably foreseeable at the time, that any duty was not breached, and that the suspension was not the cause of his injury. Mr Potter appealed. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding the trial judge made no error on any of these four issues. He recovered nothing in this proceeding.

Incident & injury

Psychiatric injury alleged to arise from employer's decision to suspend the employee on full pay pending a misconduct investigation

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood
Incident date
21 July 2014
Location
Gympie, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
9 December 2022
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
43
Occupation
Manager, Local Laws Branch (local council) Manager
Liability
Disputed
Total damages
$0

Outcome

The Court of Appeal dismissed the employee's appeal against the dismissal of his claim for damages for psychiatric injury arising from his suspension. The appellant failed to establish error in the primary judge's findings on duty of care, foreseeability, breach and causation.

Defendant

1 Gympie Regional Council

Employer

Judgment against this defendant
$0

Key issues

  • Duty of care in suspending an employee
  • Reasonable foreseeability of psychiatric injury
  • Breach of duty / disciplinary procedures
  • Causation under s 305D WCRA
  • Workplace stress vs recognised psychiatric illness
📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Potter v Gympie Regional Council [2022] QCA 255

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about WorkCover common law claims and psychological injury claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive