Peacock v State of Queensland

[2024] QDC 179 · Barlow KC DCJ

In plain language

Jodi Peacock, a custodial corrections officer, was injured in November 2020 during her annual firearms assessment at a shooting range run by Queensland Corrective Services. As part of a 'reactionary gap test', she had to run away and stop suddenly when a gun was fired. Running this test, she felt pain in the back of her legs and later developed lower back pain, which doctors attributed to an aggravation of a previously unknown degenerative spine condition. She sued her employer, arguing it should not have required her to do the test without letting her warm up. The court found the employer was not negligent because there was no foreseeable risk of this kind of injury, especially as running quickly was part of a corrections officer's normal duties. The judge also found that her back injury had actually resolved within months and left no lasting impairment, particularly given she had a history of back pain she had not disclosed. Judgment was given for the State.

Incident & injury

While performing a reactionary gap test during firearms assessment, the plaintiff ran and stopped suddenly, causing a hamstring strain and aggravation of pre-existing lumbar degenerative disease.

Body regions
Lumbar spine
Diagnoses
Aggravation of pre-existing lumbar degenerative disc disease (L4-L5 and L5/S1 disc protrusions), Hamstring strain (resolved)
Incident date
23 November 2020
Location
Shooting range near Borallon Training and Correctional Centre, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
25 October 2024
Proceeding
Trial
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
44
Occupation
Custodial corrections officer Community & Personal Service Worker
Liability
Disputed
Whole Person Impairment
0%
Total damages
$0

Outcome

Judgment for the defendant. The court found QCS was not negligent as there was no foreseeable risk of injury, and in any event the aggravation injury had resolved by late May 2021 leaving no permanent impairment. Had liability been established, damages would have been assessed at $14,289.48.

Defendant

1 State of Queensland

Employer

Judgment against this defendant
$0
Heads of damage
General damages $0
Past economic loss $8,001
Past superannuation $1,020
Future loss of economic capacity $0
Past special damages (plaintiff) $4,300
Future special damages $0
Fox v Wood $968
Subtotal before refunds $14,289

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Peacock v State of Queensland [2024] QDC 179

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive