Park v Nam & Anor

[2023] QDC 140 · Sheridan DCJ

In plain language

Mr Park was a passenger in a car driven by a work manager taking him to hospital for a medical check after he was electrocuted at work. On a dark country road at night, the car hit a dead cow lying in the middle of the road. Mr Park said the crash injured his neck, mid and lower back, left knee, and caused post-traumatic stress, and he sued the driver and the driver's insurer. The main question was whether the driver had been careless — for example by not using high beam, going too fast, or being distracted. The judge found the collision happened in a split second after an oncoming car swerved into their lane, that the driver had no real chance to avoid the cow, and that other drivers had hit the same animal that night. The judge decided the driver acted reasonably and was not negligent, so the claim was dismissed. The judge noted that, had the claim succeeded, damages would have been about $112,000.

Incident & injury

Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle driven by the first defendant which collided with a dead cow lying in the middle of the roadway at night

Diagnoses
Cervical soft tissue strain / musculoligamentous injury, Thoracic and lumbar soft tissue strain, Left knee contusion / post-traumatic chondromalacia patellae, Post-traumatic stress disorder (alleged)
Incident date
1 May 2020
Location
Boonah Fassifern Road, near Boonah, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
17 August 2023
Claim type
MAIA
Proceeding
Trial
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Cleaner at carrot factory (later chef) Labourer
Liability
Disputed
ISV assessed
4 · Item 89 (minor cervical injury) / Item 140 (minor knee injury)
Total damages
$0

Outcome

The court found the first defendant driver acted as a reasonable, prudent driver in the circumstances of a sudden collision with a dead cow on a dark road and was not negligent. The claim was dismissed. Had the plaintiff succeeded, damages would have been assessed at $112,408.92.

Defendants (2)

Joint and several liability. The plaintiff received a single recovery of $0 — not the sum of the amounts shown below. The figures listed against each defendant are the judgment amounts recorded in the order; the defendants are jointly and severally liable, so the plaintiff is paid once.

Under the Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 (Qld), the CTP insurer (Allianz Australia Insurance Limited) is the actual payer of the judgment. The insured driver is named on the judgment but is not personally liable to satisfy it — the CTP policy responds.

1 Suwoo Nam

Driver

Judgment against this defendant
$0

2 Allianz Australia Insurance Limited

CTP Insurer

Judgment against this defendant
$0

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Park v Nam & Anor [2023] QDC 140

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive