Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » NYX v State of Queensland

NYX v State of Queensland

[2025] QSC 207 · North J

In plain language

The plaintiff, a woman now in her early fifties, sued the State of Queensland for psychiatric injury she says resulted from sexual abuse suffered as a child. Her father was shot and killed in 1980 when she was seven, and she claims that police and child welfare officers failed to take her into care and protection, leaving her exposed to abuse by relatives and acquaintances over the following years. She was diagnosed with complex post-traumatic stress disorder. The State applied to strike out her pleadings on the basis they disclosed no reasonable cause of action. The judge struck out both versions of her statement of claim, finding the pleadings confused a claim for breach of statutory duty (which the law does not support here) with a common law negligence claim, and failed to make clear what damage flowed from events in 1980 versus 1987. The plaintiff abandoned the statutory duty claim. She was refused leave to replead any statutory duty claim but was allowed to replead a common law negligence claim, so her case can continue in a narrower form. She was ordered to pay the State's costs.

Incident & injury

Sexual assaults by male relatives and acquaintances over period 1980-1988 following death of plaintiff's father; alleged failure by State (police and child welfare officers) to take child into care/protection

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Incident date
29 September 1980
Location
Brisbane and Townsville

Quick facts

Date of judgment
27 August 2025
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
Partial
Plaintiff age at injury
7
Occupation
Minor / Child

Outcome

Defendant's strike out application largely successful: both the Second Further Amended Statement of Claim and Third Further Amended Statement of Claim struck out. Plaintiff refused leave to replead a cause of action based on statutory duty but granted leave to replead common law duty of care. Plaintiff ordered to pay defendant's costs on the standard basis.

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

NYX v State of Queensland [2025] QSC 207

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about institutional abuse claims and psychological injury claims in Queensland.

About Sean Roche

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive