Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Miller v WorkCover Queensland

Miller v WorkCover Queensland

[2024] QDC 167 · Loury KC DCJ

In plain language

This was a costs decision that followed the dismissal of Lisa Miller's workers' compensation claim against WorkCover Queensland after a six-day trial. Because her degree of permanent impairment was less than 20 percent, the costs rules under the workers' compensation legislation applied. WorkCover had made a written final settlement offer, which Ms Miller refused. When her claim was later dismissed and she recovered nothing, the court applied the statutory costs rule and ordered her to pay WorkCover's legal costs on the standard basis from 7 September 2022, the date tied to the rejected offer. Ms Miller represented herself and made no submissions on costs. This judgment did not deal with the merits of the injury claim; the substantive trial and reasons for dismissing the claim were dealt with in a separate judgment delivered in September 2024.

Incident & injury

Plaintiff alleged she was strangled by her estranged husband (the company's director) during a workplace argument over a laptop; court found she was the aggressor and rejected the strangulation account.

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
Alleged PTSD (not established), Adjustment disorder (pre-existing, related to marital breakdown)
Incident date
20 February 2019
Location
Wet Fix Pty Ltd factory premises, Brisbane area

Quick facts

Date of judgment
1 October 2024
Proceeding
Costs
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
52
Occupation
General manager of water manufacturing business (Wet Fix Pty Ltd) Manager

Outcome

Following the dismissal of the plaintiff's workers' compensation common law claim after a six-day trial, the court ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs on the standard basis from 7 September 2022 under s 316(2)(b) of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld), the plaintiff having rejected a written final offer of settlement.

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Miller v WorkCover Queensland [2024] QDC 167

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about WorkCover common law claims and psychological injury claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive