Manca v Teys Australia Beenleigh Pty Ltd

[2024] QCA 60 · Applegarth J (Bowskill CJ and Fraser AJA agreeing)

In plain language

A meatworker slipped and fell on concrete steps at a Beenleigh meatworks in February 2020, fracturing a rib and injuring his back while carrying equipment in both hands. He sued his employer, claiming the steps were worn and covered in blood, but the trial judge found he had not proved what caused his fall and dismissed the claim. The worker appealed, challenging numerous findings of fact and the conclusion that the employer was not negligent. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. It held the trial judge was entitled to find there was no significant blood or water on the steps, that the worker's boots had adequate non-slip tread, and that the worker could have carried his equipment in one hand and used the handrail. The court also rejected a late argument about inadequate instructions because it had not been pleaded. The worker recovered nothing, and the appeal was dismissed with costs.

Incident & injury

Slipped and fell descending concrete steps adjacent to the 'blooding floor' of the meatworks while carrying equipment in both hands; fell backwards onto the edge of a step.

Diagnoses
fractured rib, soft tissue spinal injury, arm graze
Incident date
11 February 2020
Location
Teys Beenleigh meatworks, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
19 April 2024
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
~39 (inferred)
Occupation
Meatworker (blooding floor worker at meatworks) Labourer
Liability
Disputed · 30% contributory negligence
ISV assessed
9 uplift applied · WCRR Schedule 9 item 92 - Moderate thoracic or lumbar spine injury—soft tissue injury
Whole Person Impairment
6%
Total damages
$0

Outcome

The Court of Appeal dismissed the worker's appeal against the District Court's dismissal of his negligence claim, holding that the trial judge's findings of fact (that the cause of the fall was unproven and that the employer was not negligent) had not been shown to be in error. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Defendant

1 Teys Australia Beenleigh Pty Ltd

Employer

Judgment against this defendant
$0

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Manca v Teys Australia Beenleigh Pty Ltd [2024] QCA 60

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive