Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Logan v GBR Helicopters & Ors; Grant v GBR Helicopters & Ors; Murray v GBR Helicopters & Ors

Logan v GBR Helicopters & Ors; Grant v GBR Helicopters & Ors; Murray v GBR Helicopters & Ors

[2021] QDC 91 ยท Porter QC DCJ

In plain language

This was a procedural decision arising from a 2011 helicopter crash near Cairns. A helicopter flying low to spot Miconia weeds hit power lines and crashed, injuring three passengers, Mr Logan, Mr Murray and Mr Grant, who were doing the spotting work as employees of Cairns Regional Council and the State of Queensland. The passengers settled their claims against the helicopter operator, GBR, for around $380,000 to $450,000 each. GBR then pursued the power-line owner, Ergon, which in turn wanted to bring the Council and the State into the proceedings on a new legal basis. The court had to decide whether to give Ergon permission to run that revised case, despite very long delays and an argument that the claim was out of time. The judge granted permission, finding the revised case was arguable and that the limitation question was not clear enough to decide at this early stage. The decision did not determine any damages for the injured passengers.

Incident & injury

Helicopter engaged in low-level flying for Miconia weed spotting collided with power lines and crashed, injuring passengers

Incident date
June 2011
Location
Cairns region, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
28 May 2021
Claim type
Other
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
N/A
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Weed-spotting worker (helicopter passenger); employee of Cairns Regional Council (Logan) / State of Queensland (Murray, Grant) Labourer

Outcome

The court granted the First Third Party (Ergon) leave to issue fourth party notices and to amend its third party pleadings in each of the three passengers' proceedings, allowing Ergon to advance a revised negligence case against the State of Queensland and Cairns Regional Council. The court declined to refuse leave on the limitation ground, holding it was not a clear case for summary determination.

Key issues

  • Third party notice out of time
  • Leave under r 194 UCPR
  • Limitation of Actions Act s 40 contribution between tortfeasors
  • Civil Aviation (Carriers' Liability) Act strict liability
  • Duty of care to helicopter operator
  • Aerial weed spotting
  • Contribution under s 6(c) Law Reform Act 1995
๐Ÿ“‘ Cite this case (AGLC4)

Logan v GBR Helicopters & Ors; Grant v GBR Helicopters & Ors; Murray v GBR Helicopters & Ors [2021] QDC 91

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

About Sean Roche

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche โ†’

โ† Back to the case archive