Kruger v Cronn & Nominal Defendant

[2025] QDC 21 · Treviño KC DCJ

In plain language

Scott Kruger lived in a Cairns suburb and was frustrated by dirt bikes being ridden on the grassed verge near his home. On 9 June 2017 he walked over to confront a rider. Kruger claimed the rider deliberately drove into him while he stood still, fracturing his right forearm, and he sued the rider and the Nominal Defendant (because the bike was uninsured). The rider and his passenger said Kruger deliberately stepped into the bike's path and swung his arm into the rider's head as they tried to pass. The judge found Kruger's evidence unreliable, noting it conflicted with what he had told his former partner, medical staff and an earlier criminal trial. The court concluded Kruger intentionally struck the rider, so the rider was not negligent and did not cause the injury. The claim was dismissed. Had the plaintiff won, damages would have been assessed at about $66,000.

Incident & injury

Plaintiff confronted a dirt bike rider on a grassed footpath and deliberately swung his right arm into the rider's head as the bike passed, fracturing his own right forearm (plaintiff alleged the bike collided with him while he stood stationary).

Body regions
Wrist, Right forearm, Respiratory, Psychiatric (Right)
Diagnoses
Comminuted fractures of right radius and ulna mid shaft, Pulmonary embolus, Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depression
Incident date
9 June 2017
Location
Kanimbla, Cairns (grassed verge on Ramsey Drive)

Quick facts

Date of judgment
7 March 2025
Claim type
MAIA
Proceeding
Trial
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
~38 (inferred)
Occupation
Boarding house supervisor / youth worker (former fitter and turner) Community & Personal Service Worker
Liability
Disputed
ISV assessed
10 uplift applied · Item 123 Moderate upper limb injury (Civil Liability Regulation 2014 Sch 4)
Total damages
$0

Outcome

The court found the plaintiff deliberately swung his arm into the dirt bike rider's head, rebutting the presumption arising from the rider's dangerous driving conviction under s 79(3) Evidence Act. Liability failed on duty, causation, and the s 45 CLA illegal-conduct exemption. The claim was dismissed; damages were assessed contingently at $66,472.96.

Defendants (2)

Joint and several liability. The plaintiff received a single recovery of $0 — not the sum of the amounts shown below. The figures listed against each defendant are the judgment amounts recorded in the order; the defendants are jointly and severally liable, so the plaintiff is paid once.

Under the Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 (Qld), the CTP insurer (Nominal Defendant) is the actual payer of the judgment. The insured driver is named on the judgment but is not personally liable to satisfy it — the CTP policy responds.

1 Daniel Matthew Cronn

First defendant — dirt bike rider

Judgment against this defendant
$0

2 Nominal Defendant

Second defendant — CTP insurer for unregistered vehicle under MAIA 1994 s 31(c)

Judgment against this defendant
$0

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Kruger v Cronn & Nominal Defendant [2025] QDC 21

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive