Griffin v Brisbane City Council

[2024] QCA 157 · Bond JA, Flanagan JA, Boddice JA

In plain language

A woman worked in the Brisbane City Council call centre, where she answered abusive, threatening and distressing calls, including from a persistent serial caller. In March 2017 she suffered a psychiatric injury and never returned to work. The Council accepted it owed her a duty to take reasonable care against psychiatric injury, and the parties had agreed quantum at $251,000 (clear of the WorkCover refund), but the Council disputed whether it had breached its duty and whether any breach caused her injury. The trial judge dismissed her claim on the basis that her injury was not reasonably foreseeable — a question that was not actually in dispute — and did not decide breach or causation under the correct workers' compensation legal framework. The Court of Appeal allowed her appeal, set aside the dismissal, and sent the case back to the trial judge to make proper findings. The court ordered the Council to bear its own costs of the appeal, with the worker's appeal costs to be her costs in the original proceeding.

Incident & injury

Psychiatric injury sustained over the course of employment in a call centre dealing with aggressive, abusive and distressing calls, including from a particular serial caller

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
Psychiatric injury
Incident date
5 March 2017
Location
Brisbane City Council call centre, Brisbane

Quick facts

Date of judgment
30 August 2024
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Call centre worker (answering and logging incoming telephone calls) Community & Personal Service Worker

Outcome

Appeal allowed. The Court of Appeal held that the trial judge's fact-finding miscarried because she dismissed the claim on a foreseeability basis not contended for, and did not decide breach or causation within the s 305B / s 305D framework. The matter was remitted to the primary judge for further reasons and a further hearing. Quantum was agreed at trial at $251,000 clear of the WorkCover refund but no judgment sum was entered.

Defendant

1 Brisbane City Council

Employer

Judgment against this defendant
$0

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Griffin v Brisbane City Council [2024] QCA 157

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive