Grapes v AAI Limited

[2025] QCA 60 · Bradley JA (Bond JA and Ryan J agreeing)

In plain language

The appellant was a paramedic who attended a serious car accident at Mount Tamborine in September 2018, where she treated a passenger whose arm had been almost severed. She later developed post-traumatic stress disorder and could no longer work. She did not sue the driver or the compulsory third party insurer within the three-year limit, so she applied to the court to extend the limitation period. A Supreme Court judge refused the extension, finding she could have used a solicitor to identify the driver and insurer much earlier, but did not take that step. She appealed. The Court of Appeal dismissed her appeal, holding that while her psychiatric condition was significant, she had been able to pursue other legal matters during the same period and could reasonably have engaged a solicitor to find the missing details before late 2023. Because she could not show she had taken all reasonable steps, the court could not extend the limitation period, and her personal injury claim cannot now proceed. She was ordered to pay the respondents' costs.

Incident & injury

Paramedic attended the scene of a single-vehicle motor accident as a first responder, treating a passenger whose arm had been almost completely amputated, and retrieving the passenger's humerus bone; developed psychiatric injury from trauma exposure.

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Major depressive disorder
Incident date
2 September 2018
Location
Mount Tamborine, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
2 May 2025
Claim type
MAIA
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Paramedic with the Queensland Ambulance Service Professional

Outcome

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appellant's appeal against the refusal of an extension of the limitation period under s 31(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld). The Court held the appellant failed to show she had taken all reasonable steps to ascertain the identity of the driver and CTP insurer before November 2023, and ordered her to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal.

Key issues

Appeal

This decision was the subject of a subsequent appeal: Grapes v AAI Limited [2024] QSC 267

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Grapes v AAI Limited [2025] QCA 60

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive