Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Giles v State of Queensland

Giles v State of Queensland

[2021] QCA 206 · McMurdo JA (Fraser JA and Wilson J agreeing)

In plain language

Mr Giles was a long-serving firefighter who attended Australia's worst house fire at Slacks Creek in 2011, where 11 people, including eight children, died. He remained at the scene for almost nine hours and afterwards developed post-traumatic stress disorder that ended his career. He sued the State of Queensland, arguing his employer should have rotated his crew out earlier and checked on his wellbeing more carefully. At trial the court found no breach of the employer's duty, partly because supervisors had asked after his welfare and he did not show distress, and because the medical evidence did not establish that earlier rotation would have prevented the PTSD. Mr Giles appealed. The Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal, finding the trial judge was entitled to prefer the State's psychiatric expert and that causation had not been proven. He recovered nothing and was ordered to pay costs.

Incident & injury

Firefighter attended Australia's worst house fire (11 deaths including 8 children) for nearly nine hours, developing PTSD; alleged employer failed to rotate him out and to adequately monitor his welfare

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Incident date
24 August 2011
Location
Slacks Creek, Queensland (Wagensveldt Street house fire)

Quick facts

Date of judgment
28 September 2021
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
56
Occupation
Firefighter (Queensland Fire and Rescue Service) Community & Personal Service Worker
Liability
Disputed
Total damages
$0

Outcome

The Court of Appeal dismissed the firefighter's appeal against the trial judge's finding that the State had not breached its duty of care. No error was shown in preferring the defendant's psychiatric expert, and causation was in any event not established. Appeal dismissed with costs.

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Giles v State of Queensland [2021] QCA 206

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about WorkCover common law claims and psychological injury claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive