Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Frazer v State of Queensland

Frazer v State of Queensland

[2026] QSC 82 · Crow J

In plain language

Ms Frazer, an experienced high school teacher at Urangan State High School, sued her employer, the State of Queensland, for a psychiatric injury (post-traumatic stress disorder). An angry parent, upset about allegations made against Ms Frazer, came onto the school grounds, banged on the staffroom door and behaved aggressively while trying to confront her. The principal sent staff and a school-based police officer to deal with the situation, and the parent eventually left without touching anyone. The main questions were whether the school failed to take reasonable precautions (such as physically removing the parent, calling a lockdown, or warning the teacher) and whether any such failure caused her injury. The judge found the principal acted reasonably in the one to two minutes available and that none of the suggested precautions would have prevented the injury. Although the court worked out that her damages would have been about $678,000 if she had won, it gave judgment for the State, so she recovered nothing.

Incident & injury

Psychiatric injury (PTSD) suffered by a teacher following an incident where an angry parent entered the school grounds, banged on the staffroom door, and aggressively confronted/threatened staff while looking to confront the plaintiff over allegations made against her.

An angry parent banged on the staffroom door Tap to play
Read the findings as text
  1. Lockdown, force or a warning. The precautions pressed.
  2. No breach, no causation. A lockdown would send staff outside.
  3. $0 recovered. $678,307 assessed.
Embed this schematic

Paste this HTML into a page or post. It shows the drawing with its credit and a link back to this case, which the terms of use ask for.

See every case schematic
Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Incident date
24 March 2021
Location
Urangan State High School, Hervey Bay

Quick facts

Date of judgment
22 April 2026
Proceeding
Trial
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
~55 (inferred)
Occupation
Secondary schoolteacher Professional
Liability
Disputed
ISV assessed
10 · Item 12, moderate mental disorder, Schedule 9 WCRR
Whole Person Impairment
7%
Total damages
$0

Outcome

Although the court assessed the plaintiff's damages at $678,307.30, it found the State did not breach its duty of care and that causation was not established. Judgment was given for the defendant against the plaintiff, so she recovered nothing.

Defendant

1 State of Queensland

Employer

Judgment against this defendant
$0
WorkCover refund
$152,874
Heads of damage
General damages $18,470
Past economic loss $300,000
Interest on past EL $22,224
Past superannuation $33,000
Future loss of economic capacity $370,000
Future superannuation $44,400
Past special damages (plaintiff) $5,822
Past special damages (WorkCover) $19,948
Interest on past special damages $705
Fox v Wood $16,612
Subtotal before refunds $831,451

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Frazer v State of Queensland [2026] QSC 82

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about WorkCover common law claims and psychological injury claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive