Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Forostenko v Springfree Trampoline Australia Pty Ltd (No. 2)

Forostenko v Springfree Trampoline Australia Pty Ltd (No. 2)

[2024] QSC 126 · Hindman J

In plain language

This was the costs decision following a trial in which the plaintiff recovered $744,175 for a foot injury suffered while jumping on a Springfree trampoline on Christmas Day 2017. The defendant manufacturer had contested both fault and the amount of damages at trial and lost. Because the plaintiff had earlier made settlement offers the defendant rejected, he asked the court to make the defendant pay his legal costs at the higher 'indemnity' rate. The court declined. It noted the plaintiff had only clearly made out the part of his case he ultimately won shortly before trial, had abandoned several arguments and succeeded on only about a fifth of the damages he claimed. Balancing these factors, the judge ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs on the ordinary 'standard' basis, assessed on the lower District Court scale because the award fell within that court's limits.

Note: The defendant manufacturer later appealed the substantive decision and won, undoing the award of damages, and causing costs to actually be payable by the plaintiff to the defendant.

Incident & injury

Foot injury suffered while jumping on a Springfree trampoline

Body regions
Ankle / foot, Foot
Incident date
25 December 2017

Quick facts

Date of judgment
19 June 2024
Proceeding
Costs
Plaintiff outcome
N/A
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Not stated

Outcome

This is the costs decision following a contested trial in which the plaintiff recovered $744,175 against the trampoline manufacturer. Despite the plaintiff having beaten his settlement offers, the court declined indemnity costs given the plaintiff's late-developing case, abandoned allegations and limited success, ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs on the standard basis assessed on the District Court scale.

Defendant

1 Springfree Trampoline Australia Pty Ltd

Manufacturer

Judgment against this defendant
$744,175

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Forostenko v Springfree Trampoline Australia Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2024] QSC 126

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about public liability claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive