Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » ECP v State of Queensland

ECP v State of Queensland

[2026] QSC 30 · Johnstone J

In plain language

An Aboriginal woman born on Palm Island in 1953, sued the State of Queensland for personal injury. She said that when she was about six years old, in 1959 or 1960, she was raped by her teenage uncle while living with her step-grandmother, and that this happened because the State breached a duty of care it owed her as an Aboriginal child under the historical Aboriginals Preservation and Protection Act. She valued her loss, including psychiatric injury, at more than $2.7 million plus exemplary damages. The State applied for judgment without a trial, arguing the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. Johnstone J found the pleading, already in its third version, was so confused and defective that it could not be understood, and that the plaintiff could not prove the State was her guardian or owed the duty claimed. The judge entered judgment for the State and ordered the plaintiff to pay its costs. The claim cannot now proceed.

Incident & injury

Plaintiff alleged she was raped by her uncle at about age six while residing with her step-grandmother on Palm Island, said to result from the State's breach of a duty of care owed to her as an Aboriginal child

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder
Incident date
1959
Location
Palm Island, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
12 October 2026
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
6
Occupation
Minor / Child

Outcome

The State's application under UCPR r 293 succeeded. Johnstone J entered judgment for the State on the claim, finding the plaintiff had no real prospect of succeeding and that the Further Amended Statement of Claim disclosed no maintainable cause of action. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the State's costs.

Defendant

1 State of Queensland

Alleged guardian / State authority

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

ECP v State of Queensland [2026] QSC 30

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about institutional abuse claims and psychological injury claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive