Desmond-Bryzak v Lander

[2024] QSC 72 · Bradley J

In plain language

The plaintiff had pelvic mesh implant surgery performed by the defendant surgeon in Brisbane in November 2013. She suffered chronic pelvic pain, nerve damage and psychiatric injury afterwards, and later developed a claim that the surgeon had been negligent and had failed to warn her about the risks and alternatives. Because she only obtained a supportive medical opinion in early 2018, her court claim was filed after the usual three-year deadline. She asked the court to extend the limitation period so her claim could proceed. The court examined when she first knew enough facts to justify suing, including her involvement in a class action against the mesh manufacturer and a submission she made to a Senate inquiry. The judge found she had taken all reasonable steps but did not have the key facts within her knowledge until after December 2017, and that a fair trial was still possible. The extension was granted, allowing her negligence claim to go ahead.

Incident & injury

Alleged medical negligence in performing pelvic mesh implant surgery and failing to warn of the risks of the procedure, resulting in chronic pelvic pain and nerve damage.

Diagnoses
Chronic pelvic pain, Mesh erosion into urethra, Pudendal nerve damage, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Mood disorder
Incident date
28 November 2013
Location
Brisbane hospital

Quick facts

Date of judgment
2 May 2024
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Not stated

Outcome

The court granted the plaintiff an extension of the limitation period under section 31 of the Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld), finding that the material facts of a decisive character were not within her means of knowledge until after 22 December 2017 and that a fair trial remained possible.

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Desmond-Bryzak v Lander [2024] QSC 72

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive