Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Cottee v Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Ltd

Cottee v Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Ltd

[2022] QDC 112 · Barlow QC DCJ

In plain language

Jacinda Cottee was a commercial airline pilot working as First Officer when one of the aircraft's engines failed mid-flight in March 2018 due to a cracked turbine blade. She landed safely but developed post traumatic stress disorder. She lodged a workers' compensation claim and later, through solicitors, wanted to sue the companies responsible for building and maintaining the engine. The problem was she could not work out which companies were responsible until documents came to light after the three-year limitation period had almost expired. She asked the court to extend the deadline so she could sue the engine maker (Rolls Royce) and two Cobham maintenance companies. The court decided that, given her psychiatric condition and the fact the responsibility of each company was hidden until late correspondence and a contract surfaced at the hearing, she had not known the key facts in time. The court also found she had an arguable case against each company. It extended the limitation periods, letting her claims proceed.

Incident & injury

Mid-flight engine failure on Boeing 717-200 due to cracked turbine blade; aircraft landed safely on one engine; applicant suffered psychiatric injury

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Incident date
10 March 2018
Location
In-flight, Qantaslink flight Alice Springs to Brisbane

Quick facts

Date of judgment
24 May 2022
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Commercial airline pilot (First Officer) Professional

Outcome

The applicant, a commercial pilot who suffered PTSD from a mid-flight engine failure, was granted an extension of the limitation period under s 31(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act 1974 to commence proceedings against three respondents (Cobham entities and Rolls Royce), the court finding she did not know, and had no means of knowing, the identity of the parties responsible for maintaining the aircraft and engines until within the last year of the limitation period.

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Cottee v Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Ltd [2022] QDC 112

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about public liability claims and psychological injury claims in Queensland.

About Sean Roche

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive