Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Cootharinga North Queensland v Wolfs

Cootharinga North Queensland v Wolfs

[2025] QCA 106 · Cooper J (Bond JA and Ryan J agreeing)

In plain language

Diane Wolfs worked as a disability support worker for Cootharinga North Queensland, which provides accommodation for people with disabilities. She claims that in December 2016, while she was helping residents out of a vehicle in a garage, a client opened a car door into her knee and injured her. She sued her employer for damages. Her employer asked the District Court to strike out parts of her court documents, arguing they did not properly identify the risk of injury the employer should have guarded against. The District Court refused, but the employer appealed. The Court of Appeal agreed that several paragraphs of the plaintiff's pleading did not clearly state what the risk of harm was, which left the employer unable to fully understand the case against it. The court struck out those paragraphs but allowed the plaintiff to rewrite them and continue her claim. This was a procedural decision about how the case is pleaded; the plaintiff's underlying claim was not decided.

Incident & injury

While employed as a disability support worker, a client opened a car door into the plaintiff's knee, causing injury, while the plaintiff was assisting residents from a vehicle in a garage.

Body regions
Knee / lower leg, Knee
Incident date
3 December 2016
Location
Cootharinga residential facility (garage)

Quick facts

Date of judgment
20 June 2025
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
N/A
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Disability support worker Community & Personal Service Worker

Outcome

The Court of Appeal granted the employer leave to appeal and allowed its appeal against the primary judge's dismissal of a strike-out application, ordering that paragraphs 30, 30A, 31A and 32 of the plaintiff's pleading be struck out with leave to replead because the pleading failed to articulate the risk of harm. The employer's further appeal as to costs of a separate application failed for want of leave under s 118B.

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Cootharinga North Queensland v Wolfs [2025] QCA 106

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about WorkCover common law claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive