Cheryl Ann Ringelstein v Metro North Hospital and Health Service

[2025] QSC 75 · Martin SJA

Incident & injury

Total abdominal hysterectomy and posterior repair allegedly performed negligently, resulting in rectovaginal fistula, vesico-vaginal fistula, and numerous subsequent complications requiring further surgeries

Diagnoses
Rectovaginal fistula, Vesico-vaginal fistula, Sigmoid loop colostomy (stoma), Urinary incontinence, Depression
Incident date
15 June 2004
Location
Caboolture Hospital, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
17 April 2025
Proceeding
Interlocutory
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Plaintiff age at injury
47

Outcome

The applicant's s 31 application to extend the limitation period was dismissed because, despite her personal circumstances, she failed to take all reasonable steps to ascertain the material facts of a decisive character; she had been on notice since at least 2009–2010 that the limitation period had expired and that urgent action was required, yet did nothing for approximately 12 years.

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Cheryl Ann Ringelstein v Metro North Hospital and Health Service [2025] QSC 75

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive