Cheryl Ann Ringelstein v Metro North Hospital and Health Service
[2025] QSC 75 · Martin SJA
Incident & injury
Total abdominal hysterectomy and posterior repair allegedly performed negligently, resulting in rectovaginal fistula, vesico-vaginal fistula, and numerous subsequent complications requiring further surgeries
- Body regions
- Gynaecological/pelvic, Urinary, Psychiatric
- Diagnoses
- Rectovaginal fistula, Vesico-vaginal fistula, Sigmoid loop colostomy (stoma), Urinary incontinence, Depression
- Incident date
- 15 June 2004
- Location
- Caboolture Hospital, Queensland
Quick facts
- Date of judgment
- 17 April 2025
- Claim type
- PIPA Medical Negligence
- Proceeding
- Interlocutory
- Plaintiff outcome
- Unsuccessful
- Plaintiff age at injury
- 47
Outcome
The applicant's s 31 application to extend the limitation period was dismissed because, despite her personal circumstances, she failed to take all reasonable steps to ascertain the material facts of a decisive character; she had been on notice since at least 2009–2010 that the limitation period had expired and that urgent action was required, yet did nothing for approximately 12 years.
Key issues
Cheryl Ann Ringelstein v Metro North Hospital and Health Service [2025] QSC 75
When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.