Carey-Schofield v Hays Specialist Recruitment (Australia) Pty Ltd & Civeo Pty Ltd

[2024] QSC 60 · Crow J

In plain language

Aaron Carey-Schofield was a casual worker hired through a labour-hire firm (Hays) to do grounds and rubbish duties at a large accommodation village at Dysart run by Civeo. While emptying heavy bins full of food waste, he placed several full garbage bags on the ground. A wasp flew at him, he stepped back, tripped on a bag and fell, suffering a serious fracture of his left elbow that required three operations and left him with lasting pain, restricted movement and a psychiatric injury. Both companies argued they were not at fault and disputed how the accident happened. The judge found the safe system of work required bags to be placed straight into the work vehicle to avoid trip hazards, and that the plaintiff had instead been trained to leave them on the ground without a second worker to help lift heavy bags. The court awarded total damages of about $873,000, recoverable from Civeo, and split responsibility 75% to Civeo and 25% to Hays.

Incident & injury

While emptying heavy wheelie bins of food waste, the plaintiff placed full garbage bags on the ground; a wasp flew at him causing him to step backwards, trip on a garbage bag and fall onto his left elbow on concrete.

Body regions
Elbow, Left elbow/upper limb, Psychiatric (Left)
Diagnoses
Comminuted intraarticular fracture of left distal humerus, Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of left elbow with capsular contracture, Chronic adjustment disorder, Pre-existing persistent depressive disorder (dysthymia)
Incident date
24 February 2019
Location
Civeo accommodation village, Dysart, Queensland

Quick facts

Date of judgment
22 April 2024
Proceeding
Trial
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Casual facilities worker (stores/grounds) at accommodation village Labourer
Liability
Disputed
ISV assessed
20 · Item 101 (serious elbow injury) – WCRR Sch 9
Whole Person Impairment
8%
Total damages
$873,014

Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiff. The court found both defendants negligent for an unsafe system of work that allowed garbage bags to be left as trip hazards. Liability apportioned 75% to Civeo (host) and 25% to Hays (labour-hire employer), with the plaintiff recovering $873,014.08 against Civeo (the larger judgment) and Hays ordered to contribute $471,738.81.

Defendants (2)

1 Hays Specialist Recruitment (Australia) Pty Ltd

Labour-hire employer

Apportionment
25%
Judgment against this defendant
$503,596
WorkCover refund
$125,390
Heads of damage
General damages $37,920
Interest on general damages $0
Past economic loss $185,220
Interest on past EL $5,655
Past superannuation $18,522
Future loss of economic capacity $250,000
Future superannuation $29,450
Past special damages (plaintiff) $865
Past special damages (WorkCover) $90,417
Interest on past special damages $84
Future special damages $7,500
Fox v Wood $3,352
Subtotal before refunds $628,985

2 Civeo Pty Ltd

Host employer / Occupier

Apportionment
75%
Judgment against this defendant
$873,014
Heads of damage
General damages $70,000
Interest on general damages $7,000
Past economic loss $185,220
Interest on past EL $14,174
Past superannuation $18,522
Future loss of economic capacity $250,000
Future superannuation $29,450
Past care (Griffiths v Kerkemeyer) $58,676
Interest on past care $5,867
Future care $131,865
Past special damages (plaintiff) $865
Past special damages (WorkCover) $90,417
Interest on past special damages $106
Future special damages $7,500
Fox v Wood $3,352
Subtotal before refunds $873,014

Contribution orders

  • Civeo Pty Ltd ordered to contribute $471,739 to Hays Specialist Recruitment (Australia) Pty Ltd (Law Reform Act 1995 (Qld) s 6(c))

Key issues

Appeal

This decision was the subject of a subsequent appeal: [2025] QCA 161

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Carey-Schofield v Hays Specialist Recruitment (Australia) Pty Ltd & Civeo Pty Ltd [2024] QSC 60

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

← Back to the case archive