Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Bilson v Vatsonic Communications Pty Ltd & Townsville City Council

Bilson v Vatsonic Communications Pty Ltd & Townsville City Council

[2024] QDC 42 · Coker DCJ

In plain language

Leigh Bilson worked as a vacuum truck operator for Vatsonic, cleaning storm-water pits for the Townsville City Council. While he was changing a heavy hose from one valve to another, the hose suddenly flung out of his hand and struck him in the face, rupturing his left eye and leaving him functionally blind in that eye. The court found the hose moved because of stored 'torsional' energy created when council workers, contrary to the agreed system, moved and lifted the hose with a crane before he disconnected it. The judge found both the employer and the council (through its workers) had been negligent, apportioning blame 70% to Vatsonic and 30% to the council. Because the council had a contractual indemnity from Vatsonic, damages were ordered only against Vatsonic. The court accepted the eye injury had cut short the plaintiff's chance of better-paid mining work. He was awarded around $360,000 after the WorkCover refund.

On appeal, in [2024] QCA 171, the Court of Appeal held that judgment should also have been entered against the council, which all parties by then accepted, and that s 236B of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 stopped the council relying on its indemnity from Vatsonic. It set aside the trial orders and entered judgment against Vatsonic for $359,689.84, the amount the trial judge assessed, and against the council for $590,801.57. The two figures differ because the claim against the council is governed by the common law rather than the workers' compensation scheme, and the Court of Appeal assessed general damages against the council at $80,000. The 70/30 split of responsibility between them was not disturbed.

Incident & injury

Plaintiff was struck in the face by a vacuum hose coupling when stored torsional energy in the hose released as he disconnected it from the outlet valve, causing the hose to fling out of his hand and strike him on the nose and left eye.

Stored energy released as the hose was disconnected Tap to play
Read the findings as text
  1. Hose moved by crane. Contrary to the agreed system.
  2. Both negligent. 70% employer, 30% council.
  3. $590,802 against the council. On appeal, [2024] QCA 171.
Embed this schematic

Paste this HTML into a page or post. It shows the drawing with its credit and a link back to this case, which the terms of use ask for.

See every case schematic
Body regions
Ophthalmic / visual, Left eye, Face (Left)
Diagnoses
Rupture of left eye, Traumatic loss of iris, Traumatic loss of lens, Vitreous haemorrhage, Functional blindness in left eye, Psychological injury
Incident date
28 August 2017
Location
Townsville, Queensland (gross pollutant trap / storm water site)

Quick facts

Date of judgment
5 April 2024
Proceeding
Trial
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
40
Occupation
Vacuum truck operator (hydro vac truck) Machinery Operator / Driver
Liability
Disputed
ISV assessed
30 · Item 26 - Complete sight impairment in 1 eye or total loss of 1 eye
Whole Person Impairment
24%
Total damages
$359,690

Outcome

Judgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant (employer) for $359,689.84 after the WorkCover refund. Liability apportioned 70% to the first defendant and 30% to the second defendant (Townsville City Council), but damages were determined only against the first defendant; the court found the second defendant's contractual indemnity from the first defendant was enforceable and s 236B WCRA did not apply.

Defendants (2)

1 Vatsonic Communications Pty Ltd

Employer

Apportionment
70%
Judgment against this defendant
$359,690
WorkCover refund
$179,757
Heads of damage
General damages $63,950
Past economic loss $76,208
Interest on past EL $6,000
Past superannuation $7,621
Future loss of economic capacity $250,000
Future superannuation $29,425
Past special damages (WorkCover) $80,139
Interest on past special damages $233
Future special damages $19,317
Fox v Wood $3,910
Subtotal before refunds $539,447

2 Townsville City Council

Host/Principal

Apportionment
30%
Judgment against this defendant
$0

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

Bilson v Vatsonic Communications Pty Ltd & Townsville City Council [2024] QDC 42

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about labour hire and hybrid work injury claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive