BEK v BEL

[2024] QCA 154 · Brown J (Morrison and Dalton JJA)

In plain language

A woman sued her former husband for damages after he raped her three times in 2001 while she was a hospital patient. He pleaded guilty to three counts of rape in 2021, and she then started a civil claim. Because so much time had passed, she needed the court's permission to bring the claim late. A District Court judge granted that permission, finding that her husband's guilty pleas were a key new piece of evidence that only then made her claim worth pursuing. The husband appealed, arguing she had always known everything she needed to sue and so should not get extra time. The Court of Appeal disagreed and dismissed his appeal. It held that until he pleaded guilty, her case rested only on her own word against his, making the litigation too risky and not worthwhile; the guilty pleas gave her independent proof that crossed the line. This judgment only decided the limitation question, the underlying claim for damages was not determined in this decision.

Incident & injury

Three counts of rape committed by appellant (husband) against respondent (wife) in a public toilet of a hospital while respondent was an inpatient in November 2001

Body regions
Psychiatric
Incident date
November 2001
Location
Townsville (hospital)

Quick facts

Date of judgment
27 August 2024
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
Not stated
Occupation
Not stated

Outcome

Appeal from grant of extension of limitation period under s 31 Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld) dismissed by majority (Morrison JA and Brown J; Dalton JA dissenting). Majority held appellant's pleas of guilty to three counts of rape constituted a material fact of a decisive character relating to the respondent's right of action in battery, preserving the extension of time granted at first instance.

Key issues

📑 Cite this case (AGLC4)

BEK v BEL [2024] QCA 154

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

Learn more about institutional abuse claims and psychological injury claims in Queensland.

About the reviewer

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche →

← Back to the case archive