Baldock-Davis v Popham & Anor

[2023] QSC 24 ยท Cooper J

In plain language

Meah Baldock-Davis, then 20 years old, was walking towards a Gold Coast shopping centre in July 2019 when a car driven by the first defendant collided with a hatchback that was pushed into her path. She was flipped onto the bonnet, fell to the ground, and a damaged wall fell on her. She suffered spinal fractures, broken ribs, a small collapsed lung, pelvic bruising and a fractured toe. The driver's insurer admitted fault but argued her injuries were minor and that she had largely recovered. The main issue was how seriously her injuries continued to affect her, and whether they reduced her ability to work.

After examining her work pay records, medical notes, surveillance footage and social media (including her return to competitive soccer and an overseas holiday), the judge found she had overstated her ongoing symptoms. The court rejected her claims for future loss of earnings and future care, awarding her $40,635.44 โ€” far less than the hundreds of thousands she had originally sought.

Incident & injury

Plaintiff pedestrian struck from behind by a hatchback that was pushed into her path by the first defendant's vehicle, flipped onto the bonnet, then a damaged wall fell on her

Diagnoses
Cervical spine injury (possible undisplaced C7 fracture/microtrabecular injury), Lumbar spine injury - L3 and L4 transverse process avulsion fractures, Three fractured ribs, Pneumothorax, Multiple pelvic contusions, Left small toe fracture, Possible T2 microtrabecular injury, Surgical scarring
Incident date
4 July 2019
Location
Sunshine Boulevard, Broadbeach Waters, Gold Coast

Quick facts

Date of judgment
23 February 2023
Claim type
MAIA
Plaintiff outcome
Successful
Plaintiff age at injury
20
Occupation
Night filler restocking shelves at Big W Labourer
Liability
Admitted
ISV assessed
12 uplift applied ยท Item 92 (Moderate thoracic or lumbar spine injury)
Total damages
$40,635

Outcome

The court assessed damages following an admitted-liability motor accident in which the plaintiff pedestrian was struck by a vehicle. The court found the plaintiff overstated the nature, severity and ongoing effect of her injuries, rejecting claims for future economic loss, future care, and most future special damages, and awarded judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $40,635.44.

Defendants (2)

Joint and several liability. The plaintiff received a single recovery of $40,635 โ€” not the sum of the amounts shown below. The figures listed against each defendant are the judgment amounts recorded in the order; the defendants are jointly and severally liable, so the plaintiff is paid once.

Under the Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 (Qld), the CTP insurer (AAI Limited) is the actual payer of the judgment. The insured driver is named on the judgment but is not personally liable to satisfy it โ€” the CTP policy responds.

1 Adrian Popham

Driver (first defendant)

Judgment against this defendant
$40,635
Heads of damage
General damages $21,510
Interest on general damages $0
Past economic loss $5,403
Interest on past EL $428
Past superannuation $540
Future loss of economic capacity $0
Future care $0
Past special damages (plaintiff) $1,865
Past special damages (WorkCover) $4,203
Interest on past special damages $65
Future special damages $5,000
Fox v Wood $1,622
Subtotal before refunds $40,635

2 AAI Limited

CTP Insurer

Judgment against this defendant
$40,635
Heads of damage
General damages $21,510
Interest on general damages $0
Past economic loss $5,403
Interest on past EL $428
Past superannuation $540
Future loss of economic capacity $0
Future care $0
Past special damages (plaintiff) $1,865
Past special damages (WorkCover) $4,203
Interest on past special damages $65
Future special damages $5,000
Fox v Wood $1,622
Subtotal before refunds $40,635

Key issues

๐Ÿ“‘ Cite this case (AGLC4)

Baldock-Davis v Popham & Anor [2023] QSC 24

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

โ† Back to the case archive