Home » Personal Injury Quantum Database (Qld) » Allwood v Sundin, Chung, Greaves & Anor

Allwood v Sundin, Chung, Greaves & Anor

[2021] QCA 196 Β· Fraser JA (Holmes CJ and Mullins JA agreeing)

In plain language

Jason Allwood suffered work-related psychiatric injuries said to have been caused by his employer's conduct between 2008 and 2015. The Medical Assessment Tribunal assessed his first injury at 4% permanent impairment, which was below the threshold needed to bring a common-law damages claim for that injury, while a second, later injury was assessed at 20%. Mr Allwood applied to a court to review the Tribunal's decision, but did so nearly nine months after the 28-day time limit had passed. The judge at first instance refused to extend the time because there was no proper explanation for the delay, even though some of his review grounds were arguable. Mr Allwood appealed. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the judge made no error: the worker had not given evidence explaining his delay, and a 2015 medical report he already held had suggested his first injury was the more significant one. The practical effect is that the Tribunal's decision could not be challenged and stands.

Incident & injury

Work-related psychiatric/psychological injury arising from conduct of employer between 2008 and 2015 (first injury 2008–21 July 2014; second injury 22 July 2014–January 2015)

Body regions
Psychiatric
Diagnoses
Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety, Aggravation of acute depression and anxiety

Quick facts

Date of judgment
10 September 2021
Claim type
WCRA Statutory
Proceeding
Appeal
Plaintiff outcome
Unsuccessful
Occupation
Not stated

Outcome

The Court of Appeal dismissed the worker's appeal against the refusal of an extension of time to seek judicial review of a Medical Assessment Tribunal decision that assessed his first work-related psychiatric injury at 4% permanent impairment (below the common-law threshold). The primary judge found no satisfactory explanation for the nearly nine-month delay, and the Court held no House v The King error was shown.

Key issues

  • Extension of time
  • Judicial review
  • Discretion to extend time
  • Explanation for delay
  • Standing / person aggrieved
πŸ“‘ Cite this case (AGLC4)

Allwood v Sundin, Chung, Greaves & Anor [2021] QCA 196

When typing in a Word document, italicise the case name. The copy button copies plain text suitable for any editor.

About Sean Roche

Sean J. Roche
Director and Principal Solicitor, Roche Legal

Sean is the Director of Roche Legal and leads the firm's Springwood office. He holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Queensland University of Technology and a Bachelor of Business Management from the University of Queensland. Sean was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of Queensland in 2016 and in the High Court of Australia in 2018, and holds an unrestricted principal practising certificate. He is a member of the Queensland Law Society and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

About Sean Roche β†’

← Back to the case archive